the second trial mediation concluded

Morning News (Reporter Yan Fei) unauthorized photographs chest shots for a Web site as a "breast implants" with pictures,moncler 2011, hostess Li Xiang to the right of portrait and reputation have been violated by the Evercare (Beijing) Holdings Group Ltd. and Beijing Evercare Jianxiang Hospital Limited to court,moncler outlet italy, ask for a public apology and claims 185,000 yuan. Yesterday afternoon, the case in the Chaoyang Court.

Xiang alleged that last May,moncler online store,http://www.foosc.com/sportssocialnetwork/profile.php?user=quvgq8539&v=comments, the defendant in the pages of its website without authorization portrait Xiang for "breast implants" female private orthopedic medical surgical commercial publicity. Xiang believes that the company's behavior to her portrait,scarpe hogan uomo outlet,http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~zerov/light.cgi?res=1950, causing a bad reputation have negative effects,scarpe hogan outlet, disrupting the normal artist endorsements order. Accordingly requested the defendant in the country's public apology, claims the economic losses 120,000 yuan,scarpe hogan saldi, 60,000 yuan for mental damages and litigation expenses 5000 yuan.

I did not appear in court yesterday Xiang. Xiang Zhu Xiaolei attorney presented to the court tort photos. Reporters saw, compared with Xiang's own photographs of the site using a screenshot of the original photo,hogan 2013 uomo, chin above have been made removal treatment, but below the chin identical,http://shaoworld.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=76396, including necklaces and neck are the same. "This is the most intolerable place Xiang,moncler piumini outlet, malicious portrait cutting will retain only the chest as breast implants propaganda,vendita moncler, enabling visitors to websites and mistakenly believe that breast augmentation Xiang did have a relationship with the defendant."

Defendants were denied the use of a portrait Xiang, and thus not eligible for prosecution believes Xiang. "Photos do not show facial appearance Xiang, just like the chest only,outlet moncler, even familiar people can not recognize that Xiang, and therefore does not constitute a portrait legal sense." Defendant believes portrait rights protection is a particular appearance , to reflect the attitude of the main features of the appearance and expression,interactive hogan, etc., but did not display photographs involved face looks,hogan rebel, not only by the local body like that it is the plaintiff,http://cgi.www5e.biglobe.ne.jp/~you2/wolf2/joyful/joyful.cgi, and the text also did not mention her name. Because the plaintiff did not use the photo, much less one that involves violation of the right of reputation.

"If the defendant does not recognize the photo is Xiang, who then what is the defendant the burden of proof should be explained." Zhu Xiaolei said the lawyer. Asked by the judge, the defense said, involved photographs reproduced on the Web is that they come from,scarpe hogan interactive donna, specifically Which site is not clear,hogan prezzo, nor pay any fees. Currently involved in the photo from the website removed. Court will fix a day for sentencing.

After the trial,http://shuohua123.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=176395,vendita scarpe hogan, when the reporter said that only look at photos of infringement is indeed difficult to recognize when I Xiang,outlet moncler online italia, Zhu Xiaolei noted infringement or not has nothing to do with whether people recognize, Li I have the right to maintain the integrity of their image rights.

■ news

Zhang Xin I "is endorsement" awarded

Morning News (Reporter Yan Fei) to the chest at a hospital site photos do breast augmentation promotional actress Zhang Xin Xin Zhang was reported to the Chaoyang Court. After winning the first trial,giubbino moncler, the defendant appealed to the mediation concluded second trial, Xin Zhang awarded 40,http://www.limegoo.com/read.php?tid=3103&ds=1,005 one thousand. "

Xin Zhang alleged that last March, she was informed that Beijing Changhong Hospital unauthorized use of the photos on their website of her breast surgery used for commercial promotion, it claims for economic loss. The defendant hospital argued,http://www.ifelong.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=28573,spaccio piumini,http://fenghuanglou.funbbs.me/viewthread.php?tid=24986&extra=, photos do not see is the plaintiff, the general public does not see the photos and the plaintiffs together. Court of First Instance held that the plaintiff has a certain reputation, even if the photo is only involved puncturing artwork, but are familiar with the plaintiff or seen the original still more easily recognizable public,vendita hogan, constitute defamation. The defendant made the appeal after the first trial, the second trial mediation concluded,scarpe hogan, Xin Zhang compensated.